Often have I weighed the pros and cons with this question, and most of the times I have answered it with reason , pure unadulterated reason. A rationalist approach has always bitten the dust. The most unexpected situations have trailed the most expected practical reasoning and microscopic analysis of the situation.
I resign to the enemy without knowing his face, it could be fate(why is mine so vexed with my reason, the two never meet?)it could be the Murphy's law but well applied to this situation, it's such a paradox, because according to my reasoning , things were never meant to go wrong. It could be a chance but why is the probability of the complement of the set of my expectations = 1.
Does it change anything? I ask myself as I access another situation : the thought that I just gave to piece of writing above.It is no aphorism, no witty appeal to my own mind, no doused doubts, It changes nothing I surmise and If I am secretly hoping that the complement of my expectation occurs , it shall be added to my expectations and then I wonder if the occurring would become 'a null set'. Nothing Changes?
I resign to the enemy without knowing his face, it could be fate(why is mine so vexed with my reason, the two never meet?)it could be the Murphy's law but well applied to this situation, it's such a paradox, because according to my reasoning , things were never meant to go wrong. It could be a chance but why is the probability of the complement of the set of my expectations = 1.
Does it change anything? I ask myself as I access another situation : the thought that I just gave to piece of writing above.It is no aphorism, no witty appeal to my own mind, no doused doubts, It changes nothing I surmise and If I am secretly hoping that the complement of my expectation occurs , it shall be added to my expectations and then I wonder if the occurring would become 'a null set'. Nothing Changes?